There it is.
Life goes on at 11 West Avenue, but when early on a sunday morning, you witness a massive upset at the Austrailian Open, when the expected-champion Andy Roddick loses in 4 sets, then that sunday is something different.
It would be wrong to attach an explicit adjective to this difference, because quite simply, it is the only single day in the week I have off, and attaching to it a negative adjective is not fair.So I'll let Andy Roddick struggle in his own emotions.
Though the first semester of my college finished off unexpectedly quickly, without us realizing, I had thought that the second would definitely seem lengthier.But it seems that I may be proven wrong, because Humanity's worst enemy [a.k.a
time] has taken a leaf out of Schumacher's book.
One obvious and drastically visible consequence of this fast pace of life is in front of you people: lesser blog posts, and deteriorated quality of 'em.[or atleast that's what I feel!].
It has many other consequences as well:
Before the starting of the semester, I had
almost resolved that I would try to find more time for book-reading, violin-playing, and also physics.Forget the former two, even the latter, though it is a core subject, is also struggling for time.After an average 9-5 day, traversing 26 odd kilometers, by the time I get home, I'm not in much mood to do much.
But one thing that I just
cannot wait for, is for the
Formula 1 season to start!
Though the year 2005 was terrible [to say the very least], for the Ferrari F1 Team, I still can't wait to see Schumacher on the track all over again!
Didn't Federer go out too? To some new guy?
Very surprising! But even with his upset here at the A.O., Federer is still the new Sampras in my book, and Roddick is the new Agassi. In other words, Roddick will always be one step behind Federer. But perhaps it's still too early to tell.
Posted by Eucharisto | 1/26/2006 11:25:00 AM
Federer didn't go out to anyone in the A.O.Check your sources.
he had a very close fight with Tommy Haas, which resulted in a 5 setter.And it was the 1st five setter Federer has won.
He may go down as Sampras in your book or as anything you want to, but your statement that Roddick will be always a step behind him is sort of instigative.
Tennis depends a huge amount on luck.Which has been on Federer's side for quite some time.But to make such a statement is quite[don't mind my saying it] foolish.
And plus, just for your info., Federer's victory over Tommy Haas was extremely lucky.haas was undoubtedly on top, and just 1 bad decision by the chair umpire led to his loss, by leading to his frustration.Otherwise he would have won.
Posted by V | 1/26/2006 11:41:00 AM